Sirus Digital Newsletter – Edition 106

When leading, there are degrees toward behaving in a directive fashion versus doing so in a more collaborative manner. Each has its place and most of us use both – even if we might tend more strongly toward one or the other.

In a fire or flood, there is little need to debate and vote on whether to stay or leave. Directive leadership is best suited when action (not consensus) is paramount. We don’t even have to agree on where to go next; we just need to take action to leave here!

However, in times when information might be dispersed and it is not an emergency situation, a more collaborative approach brings value. A consensus can bring about a better solution than might one individual’s response.

The key is understanding where your stronger tendencies might lie and humility to know where you need help.

Yes, a fully directive approach is almost always quicker. Things move much faster when you do not need to convince. However, just remember that your ability to wisely choose is limited by your knowledge and intuition.

As you stray farther from your experience and expertise, outcomes become more about execution than planning. Often, the results can be more about luck (good or bad) than little else.

Likewise, being more collaborative does offer some shield since it is based on consensus. It is much easier to shift blame onto “the group” than to take accountability as the leader – especially when plans go awry.

Knowing how to lead when is a developed skill. It can be taught in some ways but requires practice and experience to hone.

• What is your tendency?
• Where does it serve you well and where is it a liability?
• How can you better utilize both to make you more effective overall?